|
red33m23 (December 27, 2008 at 2:20 pm)
THIS CAR IS A MIRACLE>>>
ktuck39 (December 26, 2008 at 4:00 am)
chill dude with cylinder deactivation its only 2448844873Litres
thatabu (December 22, 2008 at 9:29 pm)
Unbelievable torque for a 2.0 liter engine!
Pixus82 (November 1, 2008 at 4:00 am)
Proof that the British still know how to make fast, original cars.
XxXFPSDougXxX (September 29, 2008 at 7:22 pm)
If americans went around and turbocharged everything they would get more hp/litre. Turbocharging is like taking steroids. Personally i like having all my torque at 3200 rpms, instead of waiting till 9000 RPMs for that big as T74 you have on your little 1.8 litre v-tec
BarneyEire0900 (September 29, 2008 at 1:36 pm)
Maybe a turbo might decrease the acceleration,while a supercharger is always on point,the turbo takes power especially before it reaches optimum output..Turbos have less power consistancy!.Course superchargers have there negatives too,fuel consumption being a major one!!...I dunno really
d1skreet (September 4, 2008 at 2:51 pm)
I love people who say there's no replacement for displacement. There is, actually, and it's called Engineering. In today's world, brains > brawn. Seems like Detroit never understood this.
Zlyzer (August 26, 2008 at 8:22 pm)
yup, American manufacturers get about 4HP out of 4897689746L engines.
te1a1yourfriends (August 25, 2008 at 5:30 pm)
It would defeat the whole purpose of the vehicle. Light, fast, agile....can't do that with an engine that weighs as much as the car. Can't beat Honda's hp to litre ratio.
GD3Rico (August 25, 2008 at 4:57 pm)
i luv hondas, but there's no replacement for displacement, i want to see any other company take Mopar Performance in the 1320, it will jus never happen |
